CONVERSATION ANALYSIS ON THE INTERVIEW TEST OF THE INDONESIAN SOLIDARITY PARTY’S LEGISLATIVE CANDIDATES

Farida Indri Wijayanti

Abstract


Based on an analysis of 154 questions and their responses in the interview test of the Indonesian Solidarity Party’s legislative candidates, this article gives a descriptive overview of interview stages and the types of question-response that are implemented in the conversation. Conversation Analysis (CA) is applied as an approach. Data are from video recordings of naturally occurring conversation in the interview test that are retrieved from https://www.youtube.com. Relying on the data, this paper shows the generic structure of interview test (e.g., warm-up, confirmation, information exchange, and wrap-up), question types (e.g., wh-, disjunctive, declarative, tag, echo, narrative, and multiple), and types of responses (e.g., information, confirmation, marked confirmation, disconfirmation, choice of alternative answers, implication, code switched, and repetition). This paper reveals that wh-interrogative is used more commonly in the interview test than the other question types. Finally, information response in the form of clausal responses is mostly preferred by legislative candidates.


Keywords


Conversation Analysis, Interview Stages, Questions, Responses

Full Text:

PDF

References


Archer, D. (2005). Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640 1760): A sociopragmatic analysis (Vol. 135). John Benjamins Publishing.

Austin, John. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. New York: Clardon Press.

Bijeikienė, V., & Tamošiūnaitė, A. (2013). Quantitative and qualitative research methods in sociolinguistics: study guide.

Bolden, G. B. (2016). A simple da?: Affirming responses to polar questions in Russian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 100, 40–58.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.07.010.

Channon, A., Foulkes, P., & Walker, T. (2018). ‘But what is the reason why you know such things?’: Question and response patterns in the LADO interview. Journal of Pragmatics, 129, 154–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.015

Englert, C. (2010). Questions and responses in Dutch conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2666–2684. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.005

He, H. (2013). Coding interviews: questions, analysis & solutions. Apress.

Holmes, Janet. (2001). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Pearson Education Limited

Hoey, E. M., & Kendrick, K. H. (2017). Conversation analysis. Research Methods in Psycholinguistics: A Practical Guide, 151–173.

Jiang, F. (2013). Discourse analysis of job interview conversation: what and how to proceed in interaction. English for Specific Purposes World, 14.

Kärkkäinen, E., & Thompson, S. A. (2018). Language and bodily resources:‘Response packages’ in response to polar questions in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 123, 220–238. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.003

Lee, S.-H. (2016). Information and affiliation: Disconfirming responses to polar questions and what follows in third position. Journal of Pragmatics, 100, 59–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.003

Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Liddicoat, A. J. (2011). An introduction to conversation analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Markee, Numa. (2000). Conversation Analysis. London, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Rahardi, Kunjana. (2009). Sosiopragmatik. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Raymond, C. W. (2015). Questions and responses in Spanish monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual conversation. Language & Communication, 42, 50–68. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iangcom.2015.02.001

Schleef, Erik.’ & Meyerhoff, Miriam. (2010). Sociolinguistics Methods for Data Collection and Interpretation. In The routledge sociolinguitics reader, ed, by Schleef, Erik and Meyerhoff, Miriam (pp.1-17). London, New York: Routledge.

Stivers, T. (2010). An overview of the question–response system in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2772–2781 doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011

Stivers, T. & Sidnell, J (Eds). (2013). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Willey Blackwell.

Stivers, T., Sidnell, J., & Bergen, C. (2018). Children’s responses to questions in peer interaction: A window into the ontogenesis of interactional competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 124, 14–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.013

Ten Have, P. (2004). Understanding qualitative research and ethnomethodology. Sage.

Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics. Newyork: Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v38i2.163
View Counter: Abstract Viewed = 44 times PDF | 23 | times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Linguistik Indonesia Indexed By

CrossrefCrossrefInastiBASENLA CatalogueRoad 

 

@2019

     Creative Commons License   

 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Linguistik Indonesia
d.a. Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya
Unika Atma Jaya 
Jl. Jenderal Sudirman No. 51
Jakarta 12930 - Indonesia

View My Stats