THE CORE-OBLIQUE DISTINCTION IN SOME AUSTRONESIAN LANGUAGES OF INDONESIA AND BEYOND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v35i2.66Keywords:
core argument, oblique, grammatical relation, Austronesian, symmetricalityAbstract
This paper explores the nature of core-oblique distinctions in some Austronesian languages of Indonesia, focusing on the intermediate status between core and oblique categories. It proposes a core index, a novel method to determine the core status of an argument. Core index evidence shows that there is a cline running from syntactically core to non-core (oblique), and that the degree of coreness in Indonesian and Balinese shows striking parallelism. The proposed core-index-based analysis allows us to claim syntactic transitivity with confidence and to resolve successfully the controversial transitivity problem of the Indonesian bare verb construction. The analysis advances our understanding of the nature of semi-core arguments, syntactic transitivity, symmetricality of voice system, and alternative argument realisations, not only in Indonesian and Balinese, but also in other typologically different Austronesian languages of central and eastern Indonesia and beyond. Importantly, the core-index study also provides a means for cross-linguistic comparative analysis of the unusual alternative pattern of applicativisation whereby no core promotion is involved. The paper also discusses how the gradient nature of the core-oblique distinction, particularly semi-coreness of arguments, poses a challenge for any theory that posits discrete classes of relations.
References
Aarts, B. (2007). Syntactic gradience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aldridge, E. (2009). Antipassive in Austronesian alignment change. In D. Jonas, J. Whitman & A. Garrett (Eds.), Grammatical change: origins, nature, outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alsina, A; Mohanan, K. P.; & Mohanan, T. (2005). How to get rid of the COMP. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the LFG05 Conference.
Alsina, A. (1996). The role of argument structure in grammar: Evidence from Romance. Stanford: CSLI.
Andrews, A. D. (2007). The major functions of the noun phrase. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description (Second edition ed., Vol. 1, pp. 132-223). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Arka, I W. (2003). Balinese morphosyntax: A lexical-functional approach. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Arka, I W. (2005). Challenges and prospect of maintaining Rongga: a preliminary ethnographic report. In I. Mushin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian Linguistics Society. http://deneb.library.usyd.edu.au:8080/handle/2123/138.
Arka, I W. (2008). Voice and being core: Evidence from (eastern) Indonesian languages. In P. K. Austin & S. Musgrave (Eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages (pp. 183-227). Stanford: CSLI.
Arka, I W. & Kosmas, J. (2005). Passive without passive morphology? Evidence from Manggarai. In I W. Arka & M. D. Ross (Eds.), The many faces of Austronesian voice systems: some new empirical studies (pp. 87-117). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Arka, I W. & Manning, C. (2008). Voice and grammatical relations in Indonesian: A new perspective. In P. K. Austin & S. Musgrave (Eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian Languages (pp. 45-69). Stanford: CSLI.
Arka, I W; & Simpson, J. (2008). Objective voice and control into subject clauses in Balinese. In P. K. Austin & S. Musgrave (Eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian Languages (pp. 70-127). Stanford: CSLI.
Arka, I W, & Wechsler, S. (1996). Argument structure and linear order in Balinese binding. In M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.), The proceedings of the LFG'96 Conference. Stanford: CSLI, http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/1/toc-lfg1.html.
Baird, L. (2002). A grammar of Keo: An Austronesian language of East Nusantara. (PhD thesis), ANU, Canberra.
Baker, M. C. (1988). Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bell, S. (1983). Advancements and ascensions in Cebuano. In D. M. Perlmutter (Ed.), Studies in relational grammar 1 (pp. 143–218). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bowden, J. (2001). Taba: Description of a south Halmahera language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical functional syntax. London: Blackwell.
Bresnan, J, & Kanerva, J. M. (1989). Locative inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 1-50.
Bresnan, J. & Moshi, L. (1990). Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(2), 147-185.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding theory. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Chung, S. (1976). On the subject of two passives in Indonesian. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 57-99). NewYork: Academic Press.
Cole, P.; Hermon, G. & Yanti. (2008). Voice in Malay/Indonesian. Lingua(118), 1500-1553.
Comrie, B. (1978). Ergativity. In W.P. Lehman (Ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language (pp. 329-394). Austin: University of Austin Press.
Comrie, B. (2005). Towards a typology of ditransitive constructions. Paper presented at the the Sixth Congress of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Padang, Indonesia.
Cooreman, A; Fox, B. & Givón, T. (1984). The discourse definition of ergativity. Studies in language, 8, 8-134.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dalrymple, M. (1993). The syntax of anaphoric binding. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Dalrymple, M. (2001). Lexical Functional Grammar. San Diego: Academic Press.
Dalrymple, M. & Lødrup, H. (2000). The grammatical functions of complement clauses. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the LFG00 Conference.
De Guzman, V. P. (1988). Ergative analysis for Philippine languages: An analysis. In McGinn (Ed.), Studies in Austronesian Linguistics (pp. 1988:1323–1345.). Athens, Ohio: Center for International Studies.
Dixon, R.M.W. (1979). Ergativity. Language, 55, 59-138.
Dixon, R.M.W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, R.M.W. (2010). Basic Linguistic Theory (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dixon, R.M.W. (1997). The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Donohue, M. (1999). A Grammar of Tukang Besi. Berlin: Mouton de Gryuter.
Donohue, M. (2002). Voice in Tukang Besi and the Austronesian focus system. In F. Wouk & M.D. Ross (Eds.), The history and typology of western Austronesian voice systems (pp. 81-99). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Donohue, M. (1998). Transitivity in Tukang Besi. Studies in Language, 22(1), 83-111.
Donohue, M. (2005). The Palu'e passive: From pragmatic construction to grammatical device. In I W. Arka & M. D. Ross (Eds.), The many faces of Austronesian voice systems: Some new empirical studies (pp. 59-85). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547-617.
Dowty, D. (2003). The dual analysis of adjuncts/complements in Categorial Grammar. In E. Lang, C. Maienborn & C. Fabricius-Hansen (Eds.), Modifying adjuncts (pp. 35-66). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dryer, M. S. (1986). Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language, 62(4), 808-845.
Dryer, M. S. (1994). The discourse function of the Kutenai inverse. In T. Givón (Ed.), The pragmatics of de-transitive voice (pp. 65–99). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Florey, M. (2001). Verb and valence in Alune. In P. Austin, B. J. Blake & M. Florey (Eds.), La Trobe Papers in Linguistics (Vol. 11, pp. 73-120). Melbourne: La Trobe University.
Foley, W. A. (1998). Symmetrical voice systems and precategoriality in Philippine Languages. Paper presented at the workshop on voice and grammatical functions in Austronesian languages, LFG98, Sydney.
Foley, W. A. (2008). The place of Philippine languages in a typology of voice systems. In P. K. Austin & S. Musgrave (Eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages (pp. 22-44). Stanford: CLSI.
Foley, W. A. & Van Valin, R. D. (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frantz, D. G. (1981). Grammatical relations in universal grammar. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Gerdts, D. B. (1988). Antipassives and causatives in Ilokano: Evidence for an ergative analysis. In McGinn (Ed.), Studies in Austronesian Linguistics (pp. 295–321.). Athens, Ohio: Center for International Studies.
Givón, T. (1983). Introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: a quantitive cross-language study (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, T. (1979). From discourse to syntax: Grammar as a processing strategy. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 81-112.). New York: Academic Press.
Haspelmath, M. (2007). Ditransitive alignment splits and inverse alignment. Functions of Language 14 (1), 79–102.
Himmelmann, N. P. (2005). The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. In K. A. Adelaar & N. P. Himmelmann (Eds.), (pp. 110-181). London: Routledge.
Hopper, P. & Thompson, S. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56, 251-299.
Horie, K. (2000). Core-oblique distinction and nominalizer choice in Japanese and Korean. Studies in Language, 24(1), 77-102.
Jauhary, E. (2000). Pasif bahasa Bima. (MA thesis), Udayana University, Denpasar.
Jeong, Y. (2007). Applicatives: Structure and interpretation from a minimalist perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Katagiri, M. (2005). Voice, ergativity and transitivity in Tagalog and other Philippine languages: a typological perspective. In I W. Arka & M. D. Ross (Eds.), The many faces of Austronesian voice systems: Some new empirical studies. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Keenan, E. L. & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-99.
Kittilä, S. (2007). On the encoding of transitivity-related features on the indirect object. Functions of Language, 14(1), 149–164.
Kittilä, S. (2008). Differential Object Marking revisited: Concerning the animacy effects on the encoding of Goals. Linguistic Typology. Linguistic Typology, 12(2), 245-268.
Kosmas, J. (2000). Argumen aktor dan pemetaannya dalam bahasa Manggarai. (MA thesis), Universitas Udayana, Denpasar.
Kroeger, P. (1993). Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kroeger, P. (2005). Kimaragang. In K. A. Adelaar & N. P. Himmelmann (Eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (pp. 397-428). London: Routledge.
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. (1976). Subject and Topic: A new typology of Language. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and Topic (pp. 457-490). New York: Academic Press.
Manning, C. D. (1996). Ergativity: Argument structure and grammatical relations. Stanford: CSLI.
Marantz, A. (1993). Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In S. A. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar 1 (pp. 113-151). Stanford: CSLI.
Margetts, A. & Austin, P. K. (2007). Three-participant events in the languages of the world: towards a cross-linguistic typology. Linguistics, 45 (3), 393–451.
McCune, K. (1979). Passive function and the Indonesian passive. Oceanic Linguistics, 18, 119-169.
McGinnis, M. (2001). Variation in the phase structure of applicatives. Linguistic variation Yearbook 1, 105-146.
Mithun, M. (1994). The implications of ergativity for a Philippine voice system. In B. Fox & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), Voice: Form and Function (pp. 247–277). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Musgrave, S. (2001). Non-subject arguments in Indonesian. (PhD thesis), Melbourne University.
Musgrave, S. (2008). The grammatical function OBJ in Indonesian. In P. Austin & S. Musgrave (Eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian Languages. Stanford: CSLI.
Nakayama, T. & Ichihashi-Nakayama, K. (1994). Discourse perspective for core–oblique distinction in Japanese. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, 5, 158–177.
Pastika, I Wayan. (1999). Voice selection in Balinese narrative discourse. (PhD thesis), Australian National University.
Payne, T. E. (1982). Role and reference related subject properties and ergativity in Yup’ik Eskimo and Tagalog. Studies in Language, 6(75–106).
Peterson, D. A. (2007). Applicative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. California: CSLI Publications, Stanford and University of Chicago Press.
Purwo, B.K. (1989). Voice in Indonesian : A discourse study. In B. K. Purwo (Ed.), Serpih -serpih telaah pasif bahasa Indonesia (pp. 344-442). Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Pykkänen, L. (2008). Introducing arguments. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Quick, P. (2007). A grammar of the Pendau language of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Ross, M. D. (2002). The history and transitivity of Western Austronesian voice and voice marking. In F. Wouk & M. D. Ross (Eds.), The history and typology of Western Austronesian Voice Systems (pp. 17-62). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Ross, M. D. (2006). The argument structure of undergoer voice clauses in Formosan and other Philippine-type languages. Paper presented at the AFLA 13, Taiwan.
Sag, I. A; Wasow, T. & Bender, E. M. (2003). Syntactic theory: a formal introduction (second edition). Stanford: CSLI.
Sag, I. & Pollard, C. (1991). An integrated theory of complement control. Language, 67, 63-113.
Sawardi, F.X. (2000). Argumen kompleks bahasa Lio (Complex arguments in Lio). (MA thesis), Udayana University, Denpasar.
Schachter, P. (1977). Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects. In P. Cole & J. M. Sadock (Eds.), Syntax and semantics Vol. 8: Grammatical Relations (pp. 279-306). New York: Academic Press.
Sedeng, I N. (2000). Kalimat kompleks dan relasi gramatikal bahasa Sikka. (Master Thesis), Universitas Udayana, Denpasar.
Sells, P. (1988). Thematic and grammatical hierarchies: Albanian reflexivization. In H. Borer (Ed.), In Proceedings of the Seventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 293–303). Stanford: Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University.
Shibatani, M. (1991). Grammaticization of topic into subject. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (Vol. 2, pp. 93-133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Simpson, J. (1991). Warlpiri-morpho syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sneddon, J. N. (1996). Indonesian reference grammar. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
Teng, S. F. (2005). Grammatical relations in Puyuma. In I W. Arka & M. D. Ross (Eds.), The many faces of Austronesian voice systems: Some new empirical studies. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Teng, S. F. (2008). A reference grammar of Puyuma, an Austronesian language of Taiwan. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Thompson, S. A. (1997). Discourse motivations for the core-oblique distinction as a language universal. In A. Kamio (Ed.), Directions in functional linguistics (pp. 59-82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Uhrbach, AMy. (1988). Topicality and verbs encoding two arguments in bahasa Indonesia. In R. Mc.Ginn (Ed.), Studies in Austronesian Linguistics 76 (pp. 455-473). Ohio: Ohio University Monographs in International Studies.
Vamarasi, M. K. (1999). Grammatical relations in Bahasa Indonesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Van Valin Jr., R. D. & LaPolla, R. J. (1999). Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Valin Jr., R. D. & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verheijen, J.A.J. (1977). The lack of formative in affixes in the Manggarai language. NUSA, 5, 35-37.
Webelhuth, G. (Ed.). (1995). Government and binding theory and the minimalist program. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wechsler, S. (1999). HPSG, GB, and the Balinese bind. In A. Kathol, J.-P. Koenig & G. Webelhuth (Eds.), Lexical and constructional aspects of linguistic explanation (pp. 179-195). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Wechsler, S. & Arka, I W. (1998). Syntactic ergativity in Balinese: An argument structure based theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 387-441.
Wouk, F. (2002). Voice in the languages of Nusa Tenggara Barat. In F. Wouk & M. D. Ross (Eds.), The history and typology of western Austronesian voice systems (pp. 285-309). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The name and email address in this journal will only be used for the benefit of the Indonesian Linguistics journal and will not be used for other purposes.
