• NFN Yanti Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya
  • Tim McKinnon Quantitative Scientific Solutions
  • Peter Cole University of Delaware
  • Gabriella Hermon University of Delaware



applicatives, causatives, Indonesian-type languages, typology, Tapus


This paper constitutes an initial examination of the applicative/causative suffix -ge in Tapus, a divergent traditional Minangkabau variety spoken in rural Western Sumatra. Our aim is to show that the similarities and divergences from Standard Indonesian of traditional rural varieties provides insight into the properties of “Indonesian-type†languages in general. The distribution of applicatives/causatives in Tapus is interesting for several reasons. First, applicative/causative suffixes in Indonesian-type languages are well-known for the use of the same morphology for a variety of purposes. The fact that a single form is used for these different functions raises the question of whether the applicative/causative morphemes are two (or more) distinct morphemes or whether the form has a unitary linguistic function. We will show that the unitary analysis for causative and benefactive uses of the applicative/causative suffix cannot account for the data in Tapus. Another area of interest with regard to this suffix relates to constraints on movement.  We show that the Extreme Locality Hypothesis cannot account for the Tapus data based on the interaction between the applicative/causative suffix and information question formation/relativization. Finally, we demonstrate that Pylkkänen’s typology of applicatives makes incorrect predictions with respect to the interpretations available for benefactives in Tapus and other Indonesian-type languages, showing the necessity for an expanded taxonomy of applicative forms. Our general conclusion is that the detailed examination of grammatical constructions in divergent Malayic varieties leads to new and surprising insights into the grammatical profile of Indonesian-type languages. 


Adelaar, Sander. 1985. Proto-Malayic: The reconstruction of its phonology and parts of its morphology and lexicon. Leiden University: Doctoral Dissertation.

Arka, I Wayan. 2003. Balinese morphosyntax: A lexical-functional approach. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

Bresnan, Joan & Lioba Moshi. 1993. Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. In Sam Mchombo (ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar 1. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 50-93.

Chung, Sandra. 1976. On the subject of two passives in Indonesia. In. C. Li (Ed.), Subject and Topic. 57-98. New York: Academic Press.

Cole, Peter & Min-Jeong Son. 2004. The argument structure of verbs with the suffix -kan in Indonesian. Oceanic Linguistics 43(2). 339-364. []

Comrie, Bernard. 1975. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dardjowidjojo, Soenjono. 1978. Some aspects of Indonesian and Javanese linguistics. Manoa: University of Hawai’i.

Dardjowidjojo, Soenjono. 1983. Beberapa aspek linguistik Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Djambatan.

Davies, William D. 2003. Extreme locality in Madurese wh-question. Syntax 6. 237-259.


Davies, William D. 2005. Madurese prolepsis and its implications for a typology of raising. Language 81. 645-665. []

Davies, William D. 2010. A grammar of Madurese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Kroeger. Paul. 2007. Morphosyntactic vs. morphosemantic functions of Indonesian –kan. In Annie Zaenen, Jane Simpson, Tracy

Holloway King, Jane Grimshaw, Joan Maling, and Chris Manning (eds.), Architectures, rules, and preferences: Variations on themes of Joan Bresnan, 220-261. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Kulikov. 2001. ‘Causatives’. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, . Oesterreicher and W. Raible (eds.) Language Typology and language universals. An international handbook. Vol. 2, 889-898. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Hemmings, Charlotte. 2012. Causatives and Applicatives: The case for Polysemy in Javanese. London: University of London doctoral dissertation.

Hemmings, Charlotte. 2013. Causative and Applicatives: The case for polysemy in Javanese. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 16. 167-194. []

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological Characteristics. In A. Adelaar and N. P. Himmelmann (eds.) The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, 110-181. London: Routledge.

McKinnon, T., Yanti, Cole, P., & Hermon, G. (2015). Infixation and apophony in Malay: Description and developmental stages. Linguistik Indonesia, 33(1), 1-20.


Peterson, David. A. 2007. Applicative Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pylkkänen, Liina. 1999. Causation and External Arguments. In Liina

Pylkkänen, Angeliek van Hout, & Heidi Harley (eds.), Papers from the Penn/MIT Roundtable on the Lexicon. MITWPL 35, Cambridge, MA.

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2000. What applicative heads apply to. In Michelle Minnick, Alexander Williams & Elsi Kaiser (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 7.1. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. 197-210.

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology doctoral dissertation.

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing Arguments. Linguistics Inquiry Monograph 49. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

Shibatani, Masayoshi & Ketut Artawa. 2015. Balinese valency classes. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Volume 2, Case Studies from Austronesia, the Pacific, the Americas, and Theoretical Outlook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 877-940.

Sneddon, James.N. (1996). Indonesian reference grammar. New South Wales: Allen and Unwin.

Sneddon, James N., Alexander Adelaar, Dwi Noverini Djenar, & Michael C. Ewing. 2010. Indonesian reference grammar (2nd Ed.). New South Wales: Allen and Unwin.

Song, J. J. 1996. Causatives and Causation: A Universal-typological Perspective. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.

Vamarasi, M. K. 1999. Grammatical Relations in Bahasa Indonesia. Pacific Linguistics D-93. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.

Yanti. 2010. A reference grammar of Jambi Malay. University of Delaware: Doctoral Dissertation.




How to Cite

Yanti, N., McKinnon, T., Cole, P., & Hermon, G. (2021). THE TYPOLOGY OF APPLICATIVE/CAUSATIVE MARKING IN TAPUS. Linguistik Indonesia, 39(1), 1–28.