MEMERIKAN FUNGSI KONTEKS SITUASI DALAM PERSPEKTIF PRAGMATIK SIBER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v40i2.286Keywords:
cyberpragmatics, culture-specific pragmatics, situational contexts, digital informationAbstract
This research aims at describing the manifestation of situational contexts in the culture-specific pragmatic phenomena in the perspective of cyber-pragmatics. This is a qualitative research. The research data sources are authentic texts taken from social media captions containing situational contexts. The research data are elements of situational contexts found in the authentic utterances in social media captions. The research data are gathered using the observation method employing the note-taking technique. The gathered data are classified and typified to generate types of data in details. Then, the data are analyzed using the distributional analysis method and the pragmatic identity method. The distributional analysis method is used to analyze the linguistic dimensions of this research, while the pragmatic identity method, particularly extra-lingual identity, is applied to analyze the extra-linguistic dimensions of this research. The preliminary research results show that the situational contexts proposed by Geoffrey N. Leech need to be reinterpreted and redefined to adjust to the development of current situational contexts. Situational contexts are inseparable from the digital information technology because language is not immune from the impact of the technology development. Ignoring situational contexts in the perspective of cyber-pragmatics in studying language phenomena will not yield proper research results in the present-day contexts.
Â
Keywords: cyberpragmatics, culture-specific pragmatics, konteks situasi, informasi digital
References
Barron, A. (2017). Variational pragmatics. In The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668925
Beyer, P. (2007). Globalization and glocalization. In The SAGE Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607965.n6
Chen, J. (2017). Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics. Australian Journal of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2016.1204903
Geoffrey Leech. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goddard, C. (2009). Not taking yourself too seriously in Australian English: Semantic explications, cultural scripts, corpus evidence. Intercultural Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2009.002
Goddard, C. (2012). “Early interactions†in Australian English, American English, and English English: Cultural differences and cultural scripts. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.010
Kulkarni, D. (2014). Exploring Jakobson’s “phatic function†in instant messaging interactions. Discourse and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313507150
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. The Pragmatics of Politeness. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
Locher, M. A. (2013). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.002
Mahsun, M. (2005). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Raja Graï¬ndo Persada. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1991
Mao, L. (2003). Pragmatics: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)90073-x
Mey, J. L. (2006). Literary Pragmatics. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00315-1
Mey, J. L. L., Brown, K., & Mey, J. L. L. (2006). Pragmatics: Overview. In Encyclodpedia of language and linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1338
Rahardi, K. (2016). Personal and Communal Assumptions to Determine Pragmatic Meanings of Phatic Functions. Lingua Cultura, 10(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v10i2.897
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2017). Pragmatic Phenomena Constellation in Specific Culture Dimension Language Study. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 1(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2017.010109
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2019). Pragmatic Perspective on Phatic Functions and Language Dignity. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5C, May 2019), 261–268. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.E1039.0585C19
Rahardi, R K. (2018). Phatic Language in a Specific Culture Perspective in the Context of Internationalization of the Indonesian Language. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i9.2720
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2010). Method : Design , and Procedure Approach. Tesol Quarterly.
Science, L., Company, P., Long, M. H., Canagarajah, S., Peterson, R. A., Nagel, J., … Backus, A. (2017). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(88)90022-X
Setyaningsih, Y., & Rahardi, R. K. (2019). Quality Of Arguments Used In The First-Round Presidential Debate: Critical Pragmatics And
Stephen Toulmin‘s Perspective. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5C), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.e1102.0585c19
Sudaryanto. (2016). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.
Verschueren, J. (2015). Pragmatics, Linguistic. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53023-2
Waugh, L. R., Catalano, T., Al Masaeed, K., Do, T. H., & Renigar, P. G. (2016). Critical discourse analysis: Definition, approaches, relation to pragmatics, critique, and trends. In Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_4
Yus, F. (2003). Humor and the search for relevance. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00179-0
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics, Internet-mediated communication in context. (A. Fetzer, Ed.) (1st ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company. Retrieved from https://benjamins.com