SWITCHING LANGUAGES FOR POLITICAL FEAR, POWER AND ANGER IN DIGITALLY-SURVEILLANCED MULTILINGUAL FACEBOOK INTERACTION IN INDONESIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v40i2.345

Keywords:

code-switching, contextualization cue, identity, fear, power, anger

Abstract

This paper examines how multilingual members of FB communities in Indonesia express fear, power, and anger with Covid19 and the government undertaking of its outbreak. John J. Gumperz’s (1982) and Dell Hymes’ (2005) sociolinguistic theories on identities and choices of languages in multilingual contexts and Herring, Stein, and Virtanen’s (2013) discourse theories on digitally-mediated intercultural communication is used as theoretical concepts and frameworks, building on FB as a site for intercultural contacts where language, culture, and political ideology are practised and selection of appropriate languages and forms is the main strategy for discursive safety. Data were collected by participant observations of FB interactions involving the Tadpoles (government supporters) and the Foxes (the oppositions) in Lombok, Indonesia. Twenty key players in each group were followed from January 2020 to August 2021. As the units of the analysis, words and sentences in the statuses and the comments of these players in in-group and out-group interactions were downloaded, transcribed, and translated into English. Analysis was done ethnographically by identifying contexts and contextualization cues in the translanguaging acts. The study shows that FB citizens, particularly the Tadpoles, used multiple linguistic competences in the online ideological battles as strategies to avoid possible legal consequences. English, Arabic, and local languages assumed to be inaccessible to the government officials and supporters were used as a means of covering disapprovals and discomforts with government policies. The study also shows how politically-marginalized speakers (the Foxes) make use of varied, multilingual linguistic competence as linguistic resources and symbolic capital to deconstruct and challenge hegemony of the government and its supporters (the Tadpoles). 

Author Biography

Kamaludin Yusra, Mataram University

A Senior Lecturer at English Department, University of Mataram, NTB, Indonesia

References

Airoldi, M. (2018): Ethnography and the digital fields of social media, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2018.1465622

Al-Natour, R. (2021). The digital racist fellowship behind the anti-Aboriginal internet memes. Journal of Sociology, 57(4), 780-805.

Bryman, Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

Caliandro, A. (2018) Digital methods for ethnography: analytical concepts for ethnographers exploring social media environments. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47 (5) . pp. 551-578. ISSN 0891-2416 [Article] (doi:10.1177/0891241617702960)

Caliandro, A. (2017), "Digital Methods for Ethnography: Analytical Concepts for Ethnographers Exploring Social Media Environments," Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1–28, DOI: 10.1177/0891241617702960, http://journals.sagepub.com/eprint/SBMJXCV3kZnZbQgZvnwc/full.

Chaudhry, I., & Gruzd, A. (2020). Expressing and challenging racist discourse on Facebook: How social media weaken the “spiral of silence†theory. Policy & Internet, 12(1), 88-108.

Foley, W. A. (2012). Anthropological Linguistics: an Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publisher.

Georgakopoulou, A., & Spilioti, T. (2016a). Introduction. In Georgakopoulou, A., & Spilioti, T. (Eds.) The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication. London: Routledge, pp. 1-16.

Georgakopoulou, A., & Spilioti, T. (Eds.). (2016b). The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication. London: Routledge.

Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.

Herring, S. C., Stein, D., & Virtanen, T. (Eds.). (2013). Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Hobbs, D. (2006). “Ethnographyâ€, dalam Victor Jupp (ed.), SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Pp. 101-102.

Hoey, B. A. (2014). A simple introduction to the practice of ethnography and guide to ethnographic fieldnotes. Marshall University Digital Scholar, 2014, 1-10.

Hymes, D. (2003). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. Taylor & Francis.

Hymes, D. (2005). Models of the interaction of language and social life: toward a descriptive theory. Intercultural discourse and communication: The essential readings, 1, 4-16.

Kaihko, I. (2020) Conflict chatnography: Instant messaging apps, social media and conflict ethnography in Ukraine. Ethnography 2020, Vol. 21(1) 71–91. DOI: 10.1177/1466138118781640

Karen, G., and Baggen, S. (1981). Recognition models of alphanumeric characters. Perception & Psychophysics, 29 (3), 234-246.

Keum, B. T., & Miller, M. J. (2018). Racism on the Internet: Conceptualization and recommendations for research. Psychology of violence, 8(6), 782-791.

Kompas (2022). 2 Tersangka Ujaran Rasisme di Manokwari Tidak Ditahan, Ini Alasannya. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2022/03/21/100203778/2-tersangka-ujaran-rasisme-di-manokwari-tidak-ditahan-ini-alasannya. Kompas.com - 21/03/2022, 10:02 WIB.

Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography. Doing ethnographic research online. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kozinets, R.V. (2022), "Immersive netnography: a novel method for service experience research in virtual reality, augmented reality and metaverse contexts", Journal of Service Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-12-2021-0481

Kulavuz-Onal, D., and Va´squez, C. (2013). Reconceptualising fieldwork in a netnography of an online community of English language teachers. Ethnography and Education, 8 (2): 224-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2013.792511

Lee, C. (2016). Multilingual resources and practices in digital communication. The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication, 118-132.

Media Indonesia. (2021). Sebar Konten Rasis, Politisi Hanura Ditetapkan Tersangka. Media Indonesia Online. Selasa 26 Januari 2021, 20:40 WIB Sumber: https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/380129/sebar-konten-rasis-politisi-hanura-ditetapkan-tersangkahttps://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/380129/sebar-konten-rasis-politisi-hanura-ditetapkan-tersangka. Accessed on 4 April 2022 at 20.43 WITA.

Morals, G.M., Santos, V. F., and Goncalves, C. A. (2020). Netnography: Origins, Foundations, Evolution and Axiological and Methodological Developments and Trends. The Qualitative Report, 25 (2): 441-455.

Priyowidodo, G. (2019). Netnografi Komunikasi: Aplikasi pada Tiga Riset Lapangan. Jakarta, Rajawali Press.

SAFE.net. (2020). Daftar Kasus Netizen yang Terjerat UU ITE. https://id/safenet.or.id/daftarkasus/ Accessed on 4 April 2022 at 10.25 WITA.

Saville-Troike, M. (2003). The Ethnography of Communication: an Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Routledge.

Tynes, B., Reynolds, L., & Greenfield, P. M. (2004). Adolescence, race, and ethnicity on the Internet: A comparison of discourse in monitored vs. unmonitored chat rooms. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 667-684.

Wang, D. and Liu, S. (2021). Doing Ethnography on Social Media: A Methodological Reflection on the Study of Online Groups in China. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(8-9): 977–987 DOI: 10.1177/10778004211014610

Warta Ekonomi. (2022). Kebebasan Berpendapat Dibungkam, Suara Refly Harun Lantang: Rezim Mulai Otoriter! https://wartaekonomi.co.id/read404825/kebebasan-berpendapat-dibungkam-suara-refly-harun-lantang-rezim-mulai-otoriter. Senin, 04 April 2022, 08:16 WIB.

Downloads

Published

02-08-2022

How to Cite

Yusra, K. (2022). SWITCHING LANGUAGES FOR POLITICAL FEAR, POWER AND ANGER IN DIGITALLY-SURVEILLANCED MULTILINGUAL FACEBOOK INTERACTION IN INDONESIA. Linguistik Indonesia, 40(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v40i2.345