EXAMINING THE IMPERATIVE CLAUSES IN MANGGARAI

Salahuddin Salahuddin

doi:10.26499/li.v41i1.445

Authors

Salahuddin Salahuddin Magister Linguistik UGM http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8485-6030

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v41i1.445

Keywords:

Imperative clauses, Kempo Dialect, Manggarai Language

Abstract

This study aims to formulate case markings in imperative clauses in the Manggarai language. This study examines several formulas of imperative clause rules in previous research, which distinguished the use of gi and ga in positive imperative clauses, and neka and asi markers in negative imperative clauses. An intense interview was conducted with native speakers of the Kempo dialect and compared other examples used in previous studies to build a thorough conclusion. Some critical findings in this research are, firstly, the particles gi and ga are not an enclitic attached to the word they follow; secondly, the particles gi and ga are not specific markers for imperative clauses because they can also appear in other clause forms (e.g., declarative clauses); and thirdly, the words neka and asi in the negative imperative clauses of the Manggarai language can be used interchangeably and do not change the meaning. Thus, this study proves that there are no unique markers in the imperative clauses of the Manggarai language because the form varies relatively depending on the context with whom one is talking.

References

Book and Journal:

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2010). Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LITY.2011.039

Akoli, Marcelinus Yeri Fernandez. (2021). Negative Markers in Manggarai Language: The Case of Toe Subdialect. Deepublish Publisher. Issues in Applied Linguistics: Research and Practice.

Alwasilah, Chaedar. (1985). Beberapa Madhab dan Dikotomi Teori Linguistik. Bandung: Angkasa.

Arka, I Wayan, & Malcolm Ross. (2005). The Many Faces of Austronesian Voice Systems: Some New Empirical Studies. Australia: Pacific Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15144/PL-571

Arka, I Wayan, & Jeladu Kosmas. (2005). Passive without passive morphology? Evidence from Manggarai. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3517.4007

Arka, I Wayan. (2017). The Core-Oblique Distinction in Some Austronesian Languages of Indonesia and Beyond. Linguistik Indonesia. Volume ke-35, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v35i2.66

Barung, Kanisius. (2018). Atonic Forms in The Perspective of Deixis in Manggarai Vernacular. Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya 16.

Blust, R. (2008). Oceanic Linguistics. Is There a Bima-Sumba Subgroup? University of Hawai'i Press. Vol. 47, No. 1 (Jun. 2008), pp. 45â€“113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.0.0006

Burgers, P. S. (1946). Voorlopige Manggaraische Spraak Kunst. Netherlandsch: Unit de Bijdragen Tot Detaal Land-Envolkenkunde.

Eduard, Yohanes, & NK Mirahayuni. (2011). A Study on Manggarainese Consonant Phonemes. Parafrase Vol.11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30996/parafrase.v11i02.191

Karjo, Clara H. (2021). Phonetic and Phonotactic Analysis of Manggarai Language. Atlantis Press: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211226.018

Klamer, M. (2002). Typical Features of Austronesian Languages in Central/Eastern Indonesia. Oceanic Linguistics. Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 363-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2002.0007

Mahsun. (2019). Metode Penelitian Bahasa (Tahapan, Strategis, Metode, dan Tekniknya). Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Mangga, Stephanus. (2015). Konstruksi Pasif dalam Bahasa Manggarai: Pasif tanpa Pemarkah Verba Pasif. Ranah Volume 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v4i2.29

Mustika, I. W. (2002). Fonologi Bahasa Manggarai Dialek Manggarai Tengah: Sebuah Kajian Transformasi Generatif. Denpasar: University of Udayana. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36928/jpro.v3i1.460

Sudaryanto. (1992). Metode Linguistik: Ke Arah Memahami Metode Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakprepa: Duta Wacana University Press.

Song, J. J. (2018). Linguistic Typology. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Velupillai, V. (2012). An Introduction to Linguistic Typology. Amsterdam / Philadelphia. John Benjamins: Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.09.002

Verheijen, J.A.J. (1967-1970). Kamus Manggarai. 2 vols. 1. Manggarai-Indonesia, 2. Indonesia-Manggarai. KITLV. The Hague: Nijhoff.

Verheijen, J. A. J., & Charles E. Grimes. (1995). Manggarai In Comparative Austronesian dictionary: An introduction to Austronesian studies, part 1, fase. 1, ed. by D. T. Tryon, 585-92. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884012

Walker, Alan T. (1977). Reviewed Work(s): Kamus Manggarai by Jilis A. J. Verheijen. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. Anthropos, pp. 648-649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00127418

Internet Source:

Lubis, Syaiful Bahri. (2021). Faktor Eksternal juga Memengaruhi Bahasa Daerah Terancam Punah. https://kantorbahasantt.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/id/berita/46-syaiful-bahri-lubis-faktor-eksternal-juga-memengaruhi-bahasa-daerah-terancam-punah. Kantor Bahasa Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Diakses pada 07 Desember 2022.